tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19959879.post1466231744308505985..comments2024-03-29T03:00:06.038-07:00Comments on Jon Swift: Smearing Matt DrudgeJon Swifthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02130944579317556923noreply@blogger.comBlogger35125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19959879.post-72614698220850734952018-07-20T03:02:52.906-07:002018-07-20T03:02:52.906-07:00That is great to hear, thank you for reading!
That is great to hear, thank you for reading!<br />Penile Implant in Indiahttp://m.edtreatmentindia.com/penile-implant-treatment-in-india.phpnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19959879.post-28461504037685095572018-04-10T05:06:43.776-07:002018-04-10T05:06:43.776-07:00Thanks for sharing that. It was fun reading it. :-...Thanks for sharing that. It was fun reading it. :-)Uterine Prolapsehttp://www.healthyatra.com/diseases-and-conditions/uterine-prolapse-definition-causes-symptoms-complications-and-cost-surgery-treatment-hospital-in-indianoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19959879.post-75899880819418852472010-12-02T16:56:19.296-08:002010-12-02T16:56:19.296-08:00To be honest, I especially like the stunning look ...To be honest, I especially like the stunning look of these diamond <a href="http://www.choosemyhandbags.com/" rel="nofollow"><strong>Louis Vuitton handbags</strong></a> . They are also wonderful accessories to flaunt your luxurious lifestyle. Apparently, it is absolutely not smart to force yourself to buy something you cannot afford. If you have the ability to afford their hefty prices, your best options would be luxurious models from top designer houses like Rolex, Omega, and Cartier.longgehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17588180289785941023noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19959879.post-33779246429205263002010-10-12T02:47:26.041-07:002010-10-12T02:47:26.041-07:00http://uggshoe.bravejournal.com
http://uggloveshoe...http://uggshoe.bravejournal.com<br />http://uggloveshoes.bravejournal.com<br />http://www.flixya.com/user/warmugg<br />http://www.flixya.com/user/uggshoes7<br />http://uggloveshoes.wordpress.com/<br />http://uggloveboots.wordpress.com/<br />http://uggloveshoes.webs.com/apps/blog/<br />http://warmugg.webs.com/apps/blog/<br />http://blogs.bigadda.com/ugg5069869/<br />http://blogs.bigadda.com/war5070558/<br />http://blogs.bigadda.com/ugg5070561/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19959879.post-23852856413585445772008-08-21T12:36:00.000-07:002008-08-21T12:36:00.000-07:00How, exactly, can you describe someone as "a very ...How, exactly, can you describe someone as "a very reliable anonymous source whose credentials no one had questioned and who didn't appear to have an axe to grind" and then go on to term the source as "unassailable" and "unimpeached"?<BR/><BR/>How would one go about testing the creditibility and reliability of an anonymous source? Or impeaching that source? Wouldn't one need to know who the source was in order to do that? Should we simply take Drudge's word for this? Or Swift's?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19959879.post-23489033325471557242008-02-09T16:46:00.000-08:002008-02-09T16:46:00.000-08:00I want to smear something all over drudge's face, ...I want to smear something all over drudge's face, if you know what I mean...<BR/><BR/>Daily drudgers, drudge on: <A HREF="http://www.drudgetracker.com" REL="nofollow">drudgetracker.com</A>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19959879.post-13599744485272572142007-04-14T08:22:00.000-07:002007-04-14T08:22:00.000-07:00abuser = accuser, obv. whoops!abuser = accuser, obv. whoops!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19959879.post-69771990351686452032007-04-14T08:21:00.000-07:002007-04-14T08:21:00.000-07:00Generally speaking, when an accusation is made, th...Generally speaking, when an accusation is made, the burden of proof is on the abuser. If you're going to make a claim, you have to be able to substantiate that claim. <BR/><BR/>If Drudge is going to accuse ANYONE of heckling, he needs to back it up with some evidence.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19959879.post-81402123654790670902007-04-14T06:38:00.000-07:002007-04-14T06:38:00.000-07:00something something blah blah MATT DRUDGE. blah b...something something blah blah MATT DRUDGE. blah blah MATT DRUDGE blahdy blah.<BR/><BR/>"he rules our world"<BR/><BR/>M. Halperin, useful idiotRobert Greenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06731808616299843937noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19959879.post-81653513834622524052007-04-07T21:42:00.000-07:002007-04-07T21:42:00.000-07:00Ahh...yes. When things aren't going right - when t...Ahh...yes. When things aren't going right - when the wheels start falling off- who do they pick on? THE DRUNKS, THAT'S WHO!! It's getting so you can't even loll in the corner with a big pee-stain on the front of your corduroys anymore, without attracting the attention of some self-righteous prick who impugns the quality of your reporting just because your hair is crusted with vomit. Everyone knows alcoholics stand out like a cockroach on a wedding cake in a Muslim country - doesn't Ware have enough problems already without calling attention to them? Besides, it's John McCain's fault anyway - what kind of retard gives a press conference without first positioning a goon squad outside to weed out everyone who might speak their mind? Last, but by no means least, the PRESIDENT is an alcoholic!! Grab a six-pack of sensitivity, will you? Do you think he wants to be reminded about all the times he woke up with his underwear on his head and his hand duct-taped to his crank?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19959879.post-55537669417971796672007-04-06T12:02:00.000-07:002007-04-06T12:02:00.000-07:00As always, Jon, fabulous. This truly is one of you...As always, Jon, fabulous. This truly is one of your best. One line stuck out to me though:<BR/><BR/>"Looks like Drudge got burned, as, to a lesser degree, did those of us who relied on him." <BR/><BR/>I can only say, if they rely on MATT DRUDGE (note the full use of his name) then they must be drunk, for four years, under their beds, in the twilight zone.<BR/><BR/>Thanks for the great post.Sam Jasperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15609640045088229908noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19959879.post-54697274921751744302007-04-06T05:58:00.000-07:002007-04-06T05:58:00.000-07:00McCain is capable of self destruct without help bu...McCain is capable of self destruct without help but I think heckling should be encouraged.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19959879.post-50816967764013141232007-04-05T14:54:00.000-07:002007-04-05T14:54:00.000-07:00Mistahcharley,You missed the April 1st post? I ju...Mistahcharley,<BR/><BR/>You missed the April 1st post? I just assumed you were the one threatening to bring charges. I mean, gosh, the things he had to say about you. <BR/><BR/>I guess it's just as well you missed it...the scars may never have healed.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19959879.post-53877735034384413192007-04-05T12:52:00.000-07:002007-04-05T12:52:00.000-07:00That Matt Drudge accusation was discredited, which...That Matt Drudge accusation was discredited, which is your explanation of why you can't find the report on the Web anymore. Hard for me to take anyone serious who thinks Matt Drudge can do no wrong. Maybe Machael Ware was laughing during McCain's highly fortified propaganda stroll, hard to say. What I find hard to believe about the accusation of Michael Ware laughing is that he couldn't have been the only one laughing at McCain's ridiculous attempt to paint Baghdad as a peaceful walk in the park. That's just good comedy.Davol Whitehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04021827825223594627noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19959879.post-71602790632537105532007-04-05T12:11:00.000-07:002007-04-05T12:11:00.000-07:00Another in a long series of rapier thrusts!Another in a long series of rapier thrusts!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19959879.post-41211119621764134062007-04-05T07:41:00.000-07:002007-04-05T07:41:00.000-07:00Speaking of misintrepidation, I completely missed ...Speaking of misintrepidation, I completely missed the retracted post of April 1. It must have been really something.mistah charley, ph.d.https://www.blogger.com/profile/06688838931368329855noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19959879.post-83402148031225398892007-04-04T13:28:00.000-07:002007-04-04T13:28:00.000-07:00Smearing Drudge, with - Peanut butter? Dippity-do...Smearing Drudge, with - Peanut butter? Dippity-do? Saliva? Words are just so confusilating and open to misintrepidation...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19959879.post-51215804471982005582007-04-04T11:52:00.000-07:002007-04-04T11:52:00.000-07:00Matt Drudge is a friend of mine and Matt Drudge lo...Matt Drudge is a friend of mine and Matt Drudge loved the article, but Matt Drudge did have one nit to pick that would have made the story about Matt Drudge even more compelling. And that nit has to do with how many sentences were committed to print that did not mention Matt Drudge by name. Matt Drudge estimated nearly half did not clearly identify Matt Drudge by name. I have assured Matt Drudge that his concerns will be relayed to you and that Matt Drudge will not have to suffer this sort of shabby treatment in the future. Matt Drudge enjoyed the article and looks forward to a more balanced treatment in your next installment.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19959879.post-44730474468160530522007-04-04T10:48:00.000-07:002007-04-04T10:48:00.000-07:00Rick Moran accusing Jon Swift of "towering ignoran...Rick Moran accusing Jon Swift of "towering ignorance" is like someone from the band Ratt accusing Bob Dylan of not knowing how to write a good song.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19959879.post-49790207181202586272007-04-04T10:38:00.000-07:002007-04-04T10:38:00.000-07:00Roger Morrow, for crying out loud, do a little res...Roger Morrow, for crying out loud, do a little research before you embarrass yourself again. Michael Ware supports the conservative vision for the war. The reason he's being attacked is because he won't propagate NeoCon fantasy when he reports the situation on the ground. Read his actual remarks (instead of the spoon-fed propaganda you're currently regurgitating):<BR/><I><BR/>MICHAEL WARE, CNN CORRESPONDENT: Well, what I can tell you from the outset, Suzanne, is that, say, for example, by some bizarre political miracle, Congress was able to impose a real time line, a real deadline on the U.S. presence here or on the funding for the war here. Now that absolutely would play completely into the hands of America's identified enemies, al Qaeda in Iran. That would be handing the entire advantage to them. That's why that can never really happen.<BR/><BR/>But in terms of the broader debate, in terms of, you know, taking the temperature of the American mood, of the American public, adhering to what's going on in Congress, looking at the Congressional elections, absolutely do the insurgents, do al Qaeda and does Iran and its proxy organizations in Iraq pay attention?<BR/><BR/>Yes, for sure. I mean they know that the most certain way to strike at their enemy is to strike at his support back home. And, indeed, they monitor these things. They know that, you know, what's happening in D.C. doesn't really relate to the ground. This is just political artifice.<BR/><BR/>Nonetheless, it does tell them about the pressure points to apply. And we saw from 2003 the Baathist insurgents saying from the beginning this war will not be won on the battlefield, it will be won on that -- pointing to a TV screen.<BR/><BR/>That's where this war will be won -- Suzanne.<BR/></I><BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2007/04/internal-combustion-by-digby-can-you.html" REL="nofollow">click here for more</A> (if you've got the cojones to step outside your limbaugh-approved talking points)interruptedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18043206982527387731noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19959879.post-24383039996347644772007-04-04T10:34:00.000-07:002007-04-04T10:34:00.000-07:00A former ambassador has disputed the claim that Wa...A former ambassador has disputed the claim that Ware sought large quantities of heckling in Africa. But as the hunt continues, intelligence pundits now say Ware may have secretly moved his stockpiles of heckling across the border into Syria. And while Pundit administration officials admit that the failure to find any heckling is embarrassing, they insist that even if the intelligence proves wrong, Ware was simply waiting for the inspectors to leave and planned to reconstitute his heckling programs. Meanwhile, Vice-pundit Rodger the Dodger, said there was direct evidence linking Ware to 7-Eleven. And Dodger insisted that Ware's discouraging truthism was a threat to democracy.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19959879.post-801339817518154762007-04-04T09:57:00.000-07:002007-04-04T09:57:00.000-07:00I was wrong about Mick Ware being a heckler. But I...I was wrong about Mick Ware being a heckler. But I <A HREF="http://writingcompany.blogs.com/this_isnt_writing_its_typ/2007/04/michael_ware_no.html" REL="nofollow">stand by my earlier assertion</A> that he's a useful idiotRodger Morrowhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06367135108224954155noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19959879.post-15418676808526722862007-04-04T09:19:00.000-07:002007-04-04T09:19:00.000-07:00Good Ole Jules probably thinks that Jon is serious...Good Ole Jules probably thinks that Jon is serious. He ain't too bright. As for Rick MorOn, he was probably just recovering from a drinking binge.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19959879.post-78351853992808485832007-04-03T20:21:00.000-07:002007-04-03T20:21:00.000-07:00Btw, Jonny, are you aware that good ole Jules link...Btw, Jonny, are you aware that good ole Jules linked to you? I'm kind of amazed that he seems to have taken your side on this, considering how moderate a conservative he is.<BR/><BR/>Indeed, he wasn't about to let Ware get away, as he astutely pointed out that, while Drudge got it completely wrong and probably used April Fool's day to its fullest potential, Ware saved his nasty comments for when McCain wasn't there to defend his Neverland assertions.<BR/><BR/>So, you see, Ware is damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. If he heckles the Senator to his face, he's wrong. If he waits until after the Senator leaves to make his snide remarks, he's a coward and still wrong.<BR/><BR/>Proof positive that liberals will always, <I>always</I>, lose (except last November).<BR/><BR/>Go thou to Jules and be thou edified and awestricken.jurassicporkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01673461210301442978noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19959879.post-66524298793638223212007-04-03T20:03:00.000-07:002007-04-03T20:03:00.000-07:00After the way he'd smeared McCain last week, just ...After the way he'd smeared McCain last week, just Ware's very physical presence qualified as a heckle. I mean, if McCain can freely walk the streets of Baghdad with a mere 100 soldiers surrounding him, and being guarded by snipers, attack helicopters, armored Humvees and Gen. Petraeus's tough guy look and Bush-bolsterd credibility, then, by God, that qualifies as a safe stroll. As for the six soldiers who were killed just a mile away during McCain's and Graham's rug safari, it's their fault for not having a company of men to flank them.<BR/><BR/>And damn those Iraqis for disagreeing with the Senator. McCain's been there for, what, a dozen brief times? They've been living in Bagdad all their lives. You lose your objectivity, after a while.<BR/><BR/>So Hooray for Matt Drudge, the organic hatrack, and Hooray for drudgery everywhere!jurassicporkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01673461210301442978noreply@blogger.com