There is a lot of hysteria right now about the revelation that President Bush ordered the NSA to spy on Americans. Some are even saying that he could be impeached for this. I don't really understand why people are saying this. First of all, unlike the situation with Clinton, there is no evidence whatsoever that Bush is guilty of any sexual misconduct, which I think is necessary to impeach someone. Second, the people Bush was spying on were terrorists. Just as terrorists do not have any rights under the Geneva Conventions there is nothing in the Constitution that grants rights to terrorists. In fact, terrorists aren't even mentioned in the Constitution at all. That's why we have been able to lock them up without giving them trials or charging them. Finally, the program is classified and was illegally leaked. Unlike terrorists, President Bush does have rights under the Constitution and one thing the government can't do is use secret, illegally obtained evidence against someone. So therefore, any evidence that he did anything wrong couldn't be used anyway.