Thursday, June 21, 2007

Everything You Always Wanted To Know About Ann Althouse*

*But Were Afraid To Ask (with apologies to Dr. David Reuben)

What does Ann Althouse want?
In 1925 in a conversation with Marie Bonaparte Sigmund Freud famously asked "What do women want?" If he were alive today, he might indeed have asked, "What does Ann Althouse want?" and had just as much difficulty figuring out the answer.

What did she say about Hillary Clinton's latest campaign video that so riled the liberal blogosphere?
Most people thought the video was an amusing and innocuous send-up of the last Sopranos episode. But to Althouse, the video was actually a train rushing headlong into a dark tunnel of Freudian sexual imagery: "Bill says 'No onion rings?' and Hillary responds 'I'm looking out for ya,'" Althouse writes. "Now, the script says onion rings, because that's what the Sopranos were eating in that final scene, but I doubt if any blogger will disagree with my assertion that, coming from Bill Clinton, the 'O' of an onion ring is a vagina symbol." She goes on to say that the carrots Hillary serves instead are actually chopped up phallic symbols.

That's very, uh, interesting. So let's subject Ann Althouse's blog to Freudian analysis, since it seems only fair. Is there anything about her blog that corresponds to an onion ring?
Actually, Althouse herself tells us what the onion ring is. In response to the controversy her post stirred up in the liberal blogosphere, she wrote, "Let's talk about the onion-ring shaped vortex I started yesterday. All I did was a little casual Freudian interpretation of a Hillary Clinton campaign video." Of course, it's no coincidence that "vortex" begins with a "V."

And what is the carrot?
In yet another post about the controversy (for Althouse, writing one post about a controversy she has stirred up would be like eating just one onion ring), she refers to the Freudian implications of her rising traffic and links to a tumescent Sitemeter graph to illustrate her point, though she refuses to elaborate. She attributes this rise in traffic to a link from Glenn Reynolds of Instapundit, but in truth the links from the liberal bloggers attacking her had just as much effect. What would Freud say about links? Well, continuing with the food=sex imagery, "links" are sausages and sausages are phallic symbols.

What if someone writes about her and doesn't link to her?
She becomes enraged, a reaction that one might describe as "link envy." But while she assails those who don't link to her, she often prides herself on withholding links from people who link to her.

So how does she attract links to her vortex?
By writing posts that stir up controversy. "I'm saying outright: Come on, everybody, into the vortex," she writes. "And in they hop. It's an anti-Althousiana fest. I love it!"

So she doesn't care whose links enter her vortex?
You might think that before inviting someone into her vortex she might like to get to know them a little better, perhaps go out on a few dates first. But Althouse is on a never-ending search for a link that fulfills her and so far the only link that truly satisfies her is a link from Instapundit--or his wife.

Oh, I see. So what happens to the other links?
They suffer a terrible fate. You see her vortex is not as inviting as she claims. In fact, it is a vortex dentata. Any blogger who strays too far into this vortex ends up emasculated by one of Althouse's withering put-downs. They either get accused of being too stupid to realize she was just joking or she mocks the size of the blogger's link, for example, by calling one blogger a "grouchy little prick" or saying of another that his name means "little penis."

That sounds terrifying. What about female bloggers who enter her vortex?
According to Freud breasts were phallus substitutes. If any female blogger crosses Althouse, she immediately goes for the breasts, as Jessica Valenti discovered when she made the mistake of bringing her breasts to a lunch with Bill Clinton.

What was the Jessica Valenti Breast Controversy all about?

I'm sorry, I didn't realize…
I'm on the verge of ending this right now!

OK, OK. Well, then, why is she is so obsessed with Bill Clinton?
It's difficult to say. She claims that she voted for Clinton twice but now apparently feels betrayed by him. Freud might say that Clinton represents a man in her own life who betrayed her, perhaps her father or some other man. She seems to project on him her own rage against men in general or this man in particular.

How does she feel about Hillary?
She seems to resent Hillary for not rejecting her husband and at the same time mocks her for supposedly emasculating him.

Isn't she a law professor? Doesn't she have anything intelligent to say about the issues?
She's a tenured law professor.

Don't many liberals also hate Hillary?
They hate Althouse more.

Why does the liberal blogosphere hate Ann Althouse so much?
The liberal blogosphere was actually created just to stalk Ann Althouse. Even worse, sometimes liberal bloggers don't mention her at all as if they believe that they can punish her by pretending to ignore her. But even when they don't mention Ann Althouse by name their attacks continue on a daily basis. Even the posts that don't mention her attack her by implication using coded messages, the way Jose Padilla sends coded messages to terrorists by blinking in Morse code.

If she is so hated by the liberal blogosphere, she must be loved by the conservative blogosphere.
Surprisingly, conservatives don't like her that much either. When Althouse just happened to mention to a group of conservatives attending a dinner for the Liberty Fund that they might all be racists, they responded shockingly by attacking her and making her cry. In an exchange about the dinner with Jonah Goldberg on she seemed nonplussed by his reaction. "Why don't you see me as an ally?" she asked Goldberg. "I am trying to help you. Why must we fight, Jonah? Why didn't you reach out to me? Why didn't you talk to me in a way that would have connected with me?"

So then the centrists love her, right?
Unfortunately, when she was up for a Weblog Award for Best Centrist Blog, she launched a vicious, unprovoked attack against the beloved blogger who runs The Moderate Voice, Joe Gandelman, who is probably the nicest and most thoughtful guy in the blogosphere. At the time I said she may have been under the mistaken impression that she was nominated for Best Self-Centrist Blog.

At least her regular commenters like her, don't they?
Since most of her links come from blogs attacking her, many of her commenters insult her, too, despite her attempts to ban them as "trolls." As a teacher, though, she tries to be patient with them. "Learn to read fool," is a typical response to someone who is unable to appreciate what she calls her "short, sharp style." As she once told me, "I choose not to spoon-feed, Jon. If that catches you out, that's not my problem. It's my choice. And I will whirl around and mock you when you get it wrong, you pissy old fool." I certainly plan to stay on Althouse's good side lest there come the day when she whirls around like Stevie Nicks to mock me. Unfortunately, some people willfully persist in misreading what she has written, which is always the fault of the reader not the writer. That's why it's called misreading and not miswriting.

You know, she actually sounds pretty lonely.
Perhaps like everyone Althouse just wants to be loved but she doesn't know how to go about it. Freud believed that all love was unrequited, even self-love. No one loves Ann Althouse more than Ann Althouse does, but sadly, she doesn't always return that love.

So does Althouse post anything on her blog besides attacks on Clinton and other bloggers?
She is renowned for her trenchant, in-depth analyses of reality TV shows like American Idol and Project Runway. Novels and movies longer than ten minutes, though, tend to bore her. She also often posts pictures of flowers, some of which are open blossoms like this and some of which are long stalks like this.

More onion rings and carrots.
Well, what is the Internet anyway but a collection of ones and zeroes, which are…

Yes, I get the point. You know, Freud seems a little obsessed with sex and frankly pretty misogynist.
Althouse is a staunch feminist so if she's going to use Freud to analyze Hillary Clinton why would it be misogynist to use Freud to analyze Althouse? What's good for the goose is good for the goose. By the way, zeroes are often called "goose eggs."

Enough already. What do you think Freud really would have said about Hillary's video and Ann Althouse's blog?
Sometimes a video is just a video and a blog is just a blog.

Share This Post

blinkbits BlinkList Fark Furl LinkaGoGo Ma.gnolia NewsVine Reddit Shadows Simpy Spurl TailRank YahooMyWeb

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,


roy edroso said...

Before your excellent post I had not noticed Professor Althouse's resemblance to Miss Jean Brodie.

Hackwhackers said...

This is more than I wanted to know about the Lesser Perfesser, but you've done an admirable job.

Dave S. said...

You should expect a multi-comment barrage from Prof. Althouse any moment now, including a comment identifying her previous comments as those of Ann Althouse.

Rick Rockhill said...

Well done...I must say!

Lurch said...

In my lack of experience with Psychpathia Sexualis I never realized the truth about carrots.

I do agree with Dave. I bet she gives you four responses.

Screech said...

I wonder if she realizes that her name, Althouse, is an "outhouse"? Althouse being an alternate outhouse in the event that the main facility was already occupied.

Thers said...

To be fair, when she burst into tears at that conference, that was her fighting with libertarians.

The thing with Jonah Goldberg does qualify her as fighting with conservatives, though. I note also that on that front you left out her feud with the Pajamas Media crowd, including Little Green Footballs and Jeff Goldstein. But in this regard, perhaps even Freud would be daunted and unwilling to attempt an analysis.

jhoo said...

The new Hillary video is totally HOT!HOT!HOT!

Ann started out on the right track, but quickly veered into the moldy Freudian weeds. I watched the ad, and immediately saw that, REALLY, Hillary is using code to reach out and signal us members of the deviant sexual subculture to get on board her campaign!

For example, who is the boss? It's Hillary. Some of us recognize that she is signaling her status as a dominatrix, and Bill is her obedient slave. He pleads for an onion ring, and we know where a man wears one of those! But he's been a bad boy, so instead he gets the carrot--and it is obvious to us where she expects him to put that!

Hey now! Here comes the big Italian Daddy type cruising them strongly, but Hillary's look of disdain says clearly that he is not their type.

This is one of the most sophisticated outreach efforts from a Presidential candidate of either party that I have ever seen.

Anyway--I am off to lunch, where I will be re-assessing Hillary's candidacy with a few pals over "veggie burgers," "onion rings" and, of course, a carrot stick or three!

Could someone please explain to Ann that it's a new millennium. The symbolism of foodstuffs has changed considerably, and politics will never be the same again.

matttbastard said...

I think onions (and onion rings) are revolting; does this mean I'm trapped in the closet?

- matttbastard

Jaesoreal said...

In depth analysis of American Idol! I have been desperately seeking that out!

Anonymous said...

Ya gotta love the PIAPS!

if you're MAD
punish your country
- VOTE for Hillary

Georg said...

Hi everybody,

Let's hope Ms. Clinton will be your next president. She might be able to clean up parts of the huge mess you people created worldwide by brainless voting.


Anonymous said...

Dear Mr. Swift,



Not Ann Althouse

Halloween Jack said...

I find the forced comments about carrots to be a smokescreen for her obviously genuine interest in Jessica Valenti's breasts and Hilary's "onion ring". If only AA would take advantage of some local resources and work through those issues, she--and we--would be much happier. If she's going to get out, though--I mean, really get out--she may want to invest in some sunscreen, especially if she's going to hang out (and let it hang out) with these gals.

Anonymous said...

As much as I loathe Ann Althouse's shallow, almost sociopathic narcissism, I was turned off this post from the opening paragraph.

"What do women want?" indeed. Oh I don't know why this would turn me off, me being female and having heard this a bazillion and one old stale times. Surely you can be cleverer than this. I know you've got it in you. In the end, you made me feel sorry for the pathetic Althouse and that pisses me off.

Anonymous said...

You left out her average daily consumption of 97 ounces of bad wine.

The alcohol abuse explains her personality quite nicely.

Anonymous said...

You fell out of character, Jon.

There is no profitable way to pretend that a "reasonable conservative" would really give a hoot, I guess.

It would be one layer of complexity too many; even for a well-practiced snert like yourself.

Anonymous said...

I am so very happy I did not attend Un. of Wisconsin's Law School. Although Ms. Althouse must have some teaching/scholarly abilities, I cannot understand how this embarassment to higher education could be a tenured professor at a law school that doesn't operate out of a PO box.

Anonymous said...

"More onion rings and carrots.
Well, what is the Internet anyway but a collection of ones and zeroes, which are…"

So that's why the internet is for porn! Who knew?

Anonymous said...

Of course, any teacher who doesn't know the rather distinct difference between "learn to read fool" and "learn to read, fool" probably needs some remedial schooling. The first is an exhortation to learn how to parse the writings of a fool, whereas the other was what was probably intended.

Anonymous said...

Jon - do you think that Freud would have attached any significance to the title of her second floral blog? "La La", which just happens to be the name of the yellow Teletubby, the one with the misshapen pointy thing (or should I say penis symbol) on his head

Anonymous said...

Please remember the words of famed psychoanalyst Bugs Bunny:
"Er . . . some times a carrot is just a carrot, boss."

Anonymous said...

Dare to wear Christian Louboutin Sale
despite the little pain. The world really looks amazing from a height and this hold when one is wearing high Christian Louboutin Sandals
. Christian was the founder of Christian Louboutin Pumps
during 1990's in Italy. The Christian Louboutin Boots
were the result of a concern raised.4

Anonymous said...

Arron said...

This won't have effect in fact, that's exactly what I believe.
free cartoon porn | Halifax airport | Rivera Maya

Model Baju Blouse Wanita Terbaru 2015 said...

Hello very cool web site!! Guy .. Beautiful .. Wonderful .. I will bookmark your site and take the feeds additionally?I’m happy to find numerous useful info right here within the publish, we’d like work out extra strategies in this regard, thanks for sharing. .

Thoracic Outlet Syndrome said...

That was a VERY interesting one! Seriously interesting.

Dr. Pawan Garg said...

Thanks for sharing that. It was fun reading it. :-)

The 2008 Weblog Awards